



There is a bug report where the patch was mentioned at “Needless” probably doesn’t sound technically weird enough, so in papers about those retransmissions they were labeled “spurious”. Tcp retransmission wireshark shoretel Patch# If you’re seeing spurious retransmissions it means that the sender thought packets were lost and sent them again, even though the receiver sent an acknowledge packet for it. To find out why it does that you would need a capture close to the sender to see what the situation is at that location. Maybe the acknowledge packet got lost, so the sender could not know that the packet got through and assumed it was lost. Tcp retransmission wireshark shoretel code#.Tcp retransmission wireshark shoretel Patch#.
